Encryption Strategies for Signaling and User Data in Mobile Networks

In mobile networks, everything flows through two rivers: signaling and user data. Signaling carries the instructions (who’s calling whom, how sessions are established, how users are authenticated). User data carries the payload (your voice, your video, your banking app). Both rivers must be encrypted — otherwise, attackers can spy, manipulate, or hijack at will.

But here’s the catch: encryption in telecom has always been uneven, with different generations offering radically different protections. Let’s walk through how encryption has been applied to signaling and user data, where it fails, and what strategies make sense for operators today.

2G and 3G: Weak Locks on Big Doors

• User Data Encryption
  2G (GSM) introduced the idea of over-the-air encryption, but algorithms like A5/1 and A5/2 were broken decades ago. Attackers with modest equipment could decrypt voice and SMS in real time.

3G (UMTS) strengthened things with algorithms like KASUMI, but vulnerabilities were still found. Worse, if a device fell back to 2G, the stronger protections were instantly bypassed.

• Signaling Encryption
  There was essentially none. SS7 messages — which handle subscriber authentication, roaming, and SMS routing — were sent in the clear. Anyone with SS7 access could snoop on or manipulate signaling traffic without needing to break crypto.

Lesson learned: When you rely on weak ciphers and leave signaling naked, encryption is little more than window dressing.

4G LTE: Better, But Still Exposed

• User Data Encryption
  LTE introduced stronger algorithms like AES and SNOW 3G. Air interface encryption became robust enough to resist casual eavesdropping. For most consumers, this was a huge leap in confidentiality.
• Signaling Encryption
  Here’s the problem: while the radio access part was protected, the control-plane protocols (Diameter, GTP) were often sent unencrypted between operators. That means sensitive information like IMSIs, session setup, and roaming data still traveled in plaintext across interconnects.
• The Downgrade Problem
  Attackers exploited fallback procedures to downgrade devices to 2G or 3G, stripping away strong encryption and reverting to weaker algorithms. IMSI catchers thrived on this flaw.

Lesson learned: Encrypting the air interface isn’t enough if your core signaling still speaks in plaintext.

5G: Finally, Encryption Grows Up

• User Data Encryption
  5G continues using strong, standardized algorithms for user traffic. It also allows for integrity protection, preventing attackers from not only reading but also modifying traffic.
• Signaling Encryption
  For the first time, signaling gets serious protection. 5G introduced SUCI (Subscription Concealed Identifier), encrypting subscriber identities so IMSIs aren’t exposed in the clear. It also mandated mutual authentication, reducing the risk of fake base stations.
• End-to-End Ambitions
  5G core architecture supports end-to-end encryption at the transport layer (TLS) for service-based interfaces. That means Diameter-style plaintext exchanges are no longer acceptable in a properly deployed 5G network.

Lesson learned: 5G fixes many gaps, but coexistence with legacy generations keeps the downgrade attack vector alive.

Where Encryption Falls Short in Practice

Even with strong algorithms, encryption strategies in mobile networks can fail in several ways:

1. Misconfiguration: Operators sometimes disable encryption for performance reasons, especially in roaming scenarios.
2. Weak Key Management: If cryptographic keys are poorly protected, encryption strength doesn’t matter.
3. Lawful Intercept Backdoors: Designed for compliance, these can be abused by attackers if not tightly controlled.
4. Downgrade Attacks: A shiny 5G crypto layer won’t save you if your device is tricked into using broken 2G.
5. Interconnect Trust: If roaming partners exchange signaling over unencrypted channels, attackers can ride along.

Best Strategies for Operators

Operators can’t rely on encryption by spec alone. They need layered strategies:

• Mandate Strong Ciphers: Block weak algorithms like A5/2 and enforce AES-based encryption across devices.
• Protect Against Downgrades: Monitor and block suspicious fallback requests that force devices into weaker modes.
• Encrypt Signaling Interconnects: Use IPsec or TLS to secure SS7, Diameter, and GTP where possible.
• Harden Key Management: Protect cryptographic keys in HSMs (Hardware Security Modules), not in software or flat files.
• Audit Regularly: Test real-world deployments — a misconfigured roaming partner can expose your entire subscriber base.

Final Thoughts

Encryption in mobile networks has evolved from laughably weak (2G) to respectably strong (5G). But encryption is only as good as its implementation. Legacy compatibility, misconfigurations, and trust in roaming partners can all undermine even the best algorithms.

At the end of the day, encryption isn’t just about math — it’s about discipline. Operators who implement strong, consistent encryption strategies across both signaling and user data raise the bar for attackers. Those who don’t? They’re effectively broadcasting subscriber secrets in the clear, waiting for someone to listen.

‍