While both IT and telecom security aim to protect digital infrastructure, their goals, technologies, and threat environments differ significantly. As telecom networks increasingly adopt cloud-native architectures and intersect with IT systems, it's critical to understand what makes telecom security distinct—and why traditional IT approaches often fall short in protecting mobile networks.
Core Differences in Focus and Function
At its core, IT security is primarily concerned with protecting information: keeping data confidential, ensuring it hasn’t been tampered with, and making sure it's available when needed. IT security focuses on endpoints, servers, applications, and user access. It aims to prevent unauthorized access, data breaches, and service disruption caused by malware, ransomware, phishing, or insider threats.
Telecom security, on the other hand, is designed to protect communication services and the critical infrastructure that enables them. This includes mobile core networks, radio access networks (RAN), signaling systems, interconnects, and customer data flows. Telecom security must ensure the integrity and availability of control-plane communications that handle subscriber registration, mobility, authentication, session management, and billing—all in real-time.
Threat Models: Different Attackers, Different Goals
IT systems are typically targeted by cybercriminals looking for financial gain through data theft, credential harvesting, or ransomware. In telecom, attackers range from state-sponsored entities and advanced persistent threats (APTs) to fraudsters exploiting signaling weaknesses for financial or intelligence purposes.
Telecom-specific threats include:
- Signaling manipulation via SS7, Diameter, or GTP.
- Session hijacking or identity spoofing (IMSI catching).
- Fake base stations (Rogue BTS/eNodeB/gNodeB).
- Exploitation of registration flows in NAS or NGAP.
- Location tracking, SMS interception, or denial of service at the control plane level.
These are largely invisible to traditional IT security tools.
Complexity and Real-Time Constraints
Telecom networks must operate with extremely low latency and high availability. Downtime is unacceptable—imagine emergency services being unable to place calls, or a region-wide data outage affecting millions. Control-plane protocols like GTP, NAS, or SIP must process subscriber requests in milliseconds.
This real-time nature makes telecom security extremely time-sensitive. Detection and mitigation must happen instantly, without impacting live services. This is unlike IT environments, where detection and remediation may happen over minutes or hours.
Protocols and Traffic: A Language Gap
IT security professionals are fluent in IP protocols—HTTP, DNS, SMTP, SMB, etc. Telecom engineers, however, speak a different language: SS7, Diameter, GTP, SIP, NGAP, NAS, SCTP. These protocols are layered, stateful, and often proprietary, making them harder to analyze without specialized tools.
Without telecom-aware security systems, threats that exploit these protocols will go undetected. For example, a malformed GTP-C Create Session message may not appear malicious to a traditional SIEM but can cause severe service disruptions.
The Danger of Applying Generic IT Security to Telecom
Many operators adopt traditional IT tools like firewalls, SIEM, or IDS/IPS hoping they’ll secure the telecom domain. But generic IT security stacks don’t decode telecom protocols, correlate signaling events, or recognize abuse patterns specific to telecom.
This creates blind spots where:
- GTP tunnels remain invisible.
- Signaling fraud isn’t flagged.
- Anomalies in registration or paging aren’t recognized.
Consequently, even well-funded security operations centers (SOCs) may miss live attacks simply because their tools aren’t telecom-aware.
The Convergence Challenge
With 5G and network virtualization, the line between IT and telecom is blurring. The 5G Core is now built on cloud-native architectures, using REST APIs, HTTP/2, and service-based interfaces (SBI). Telecom functions run as containerized microservices in virtual data centers, subject to typical IT risks like API abuse, misconfiguration, or lateral movement.
Additionally, telecom operators are becoming edge compute providers, hosting third-party services on their infrastructure. This convergence means telcos must now defend against both IT and telecom threats simultaneously—and understand where they overlap.
The P1 Security Perspective
At P1 Security, we understand that telecom security cannot be treated as a subset of IT. Our tools, assessments, and training are purpose-built for mobile networks. We help telecom operators:
- Decode and monitor signaling protocols across generations (SS7, GTP, Diameter, SIP, NAS, etc.).
- Identify anomalies and correlate behavior across RAN, core, and interconnect domains.
- Run fuzzing campaigns to uncover protocol-level 0-days.
- Integrate telecom-specific intelligence into SIEMs and SOC workflows.
We bridge the IT–telecom divide by giving security teams full visibility into both domains.
Conclusion
IT and telecom security share the goal of protecting infrastructure—but they differ in threats, technologies, and stakes. As networks evolve, operators must stop relying solely on IT-based solutions and invest in telecom-native security practices.
To defend modern mobile networks, telecom-specific visibility, tools, and expertise are not optional—they are essential.
.jpg)
